“High Noon” Starring Sen. Tom Coburn

by Conservative Pup on March 18, 2010

I know that many people think that no one in Washington is worth keeping up there.  That they all need to go, to be booted out. I think that most of them do need to go, and even the ones I like make mistakes and bad choices, and I don’t always agree with them.

But, if you think that the GOP just doesn’t know how to fight, I think you’d be wrong.  Watch my senator, Dr. Tom Coburn, give this warning to the Dems who might be contemplating putting their vote up for sale.

I’ll do my part to keep this man in Washington, D.C., for as long as he wants to stay up there, or for as long as he fights like this, whichever comes first.

Thanks, Kathy, at Watching The Nation, for the H/T.


March 18, 2010 by kathy

Finally! Some Real Hope And Change!

From Washington Examiner:

Sen. Coburn to House Dems: If you vote ‘yes’ this time, I will expose your pork and filibuster your nomination after you lose
By: David Freddoso
Online Opinion Editor
03/18/10 2:02 PM EDT

Dr. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., the Senator from bomb-throw:

SEN. TOM COBURN (R), OKLAHOMA: I want to send a couple of messages to my colleagues in the House.

If you voted no and you vote yes, and you lose your election, and you think any nomination to a federal position isn’t going to be held in the Senate, I’ve got news for you. It’s going to be held.

Number two is, if you get a deal, a parochial deal for you or your district, I’ve already instructed my staff and the staff of seven other senators that we will look at every appropriations bill, at every level, at every instance, and we will outline it by district, and we will associate that with the buying of your vote. So, if you think you can cut a deal now, and it not come out until after the election, I want to tell you that isn’t going to happen. And be prepared to defend selling your vote in the House.

This is the Washington, D.C. equivalent of “I shall avenge unto the fourth generation and salt your family’s plot of land with your blood.” For once, some real change in D.C.

See it live and in person:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 10 comments }

Fighting The Abuse Of Power

by Conservative Pup on March 18, 2010

I have the “Rocky” theme music playing in my head today.

Acclaimed attorney and talk-radio host supreme, Mark Levin has been my favorite go-to person for inspiration, hope, and instruction for years.  I was most encouraged to learn that his Landmark Legal Foundation have prepared a lawsuit and are ready to file it the moment Pelosi uses the unconstitutional “deem and pass” option to get the unconstitutional health care reform rationing/control bill pushed through.

The suit names as defendants Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner, Eric Holder, and Kathleen Sebelius.

2. Plaintiff Mark R. Levin is a citizen of the United States, a taxpayer, and President
of Landmark. Mr. Levin carries health insurance through the Landmark-sponsored plan.


3. Defendant Barack Obama is the President of the United States, who in his official
capacity, after adoption in full accord with the Constitution by the Senate and House of
Representatives (the “House”) may sign bills into law. As the head of the Executive Branch, he
is empowered to direct and enforce the laws of the United States, but the power must stem
“either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself,” Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v.
Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 585 (1952).


4. Defendant Timothy Geithner is the United States Secretary of the Treasury, and is
responsible for formulating economic and tax policy, managing the public debt, and overseeing
the collection of taxes and enforcement of the tax laws of this country.


5. Defendant Eric Holder is the United States Attorney General, heads the United
States Department of Justice, and is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States
Government, with the responsibility for bringing civil and criminal actions to assure that the laws
of the United States are upheld.


6. Defendant Kathleen Sebelius is the United States Secretary of Health and Human
Services, responsible for the operation of the largest civilian department in the federal
government and the administration of federal health programs, including Medicare and Medicaid.

All I can is, go Mark go! I’m going to make a donation to the Landmark Legal Foundation in appreciation, and to feel like I’m participating in his effort.  He is doing just what I would like to do.

More here and here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

Is There A John Dean In The White House?

by Conservative Pup on March 17, 2010

Amid all the attention to the unprecedented antics by the Democrats in their attempt to take absolute control of health care in America, other shady things are going on.  It’s to be expected, as the White House and Congress are currently being occupied by radical leftists and just plain thugs, having graduated from occupying deans’ offices on lovely campuses.

I’ve been thinking for the past few months now that one of these days, there will be dues to pay for this administration.  I’m not a lawyer, I don’t work in law enforcement, but I’m of reasonable intelligence and usually understand what I read and hear, and it has seemed that these people who are in control right now are breaking laws.  I mean, besides being tax cheats.

I just wonder:  is there a ‘John Dean‘ character (of Watergate notoriety, spilled all to the FBI in hopes of getting a lesser sentence) waiting in the wings, someone who might begin to get a little nervous at the thought of actually going to prison?  Someone who might begin to keep  a private diary, notes, maybe even record secretly in-house conversations never meant to be heard by anyone else?  Someone beginning to entertain thoughts of ‘making a plan’ in case certain things come to light?  Someone who has so little inner fortitude that he or she will crack at the first hint of discovery, and blab all they know?

I think there is.  I don’t have any idea who it may turn out to be, and it could be someone whose name is unfamiliar to us.  But there seems to be too much wheeling and dealing going on, not to mention blatantly unconstitutional acts by Congress, for this house-of-cards to stand.

I have a low opinion of leftists.  I don’t think they have any moral core, no internal standards, no values to get them through hard times.  I don’t think they have any true loyalty to anyone or any cause, and I believe they will always put their own well-being ahead of everything else.

I think it’s just a matter of time before we see the beginnings of another ‘gate’ scandal, and when that happens, there’s no doubt in my mind that someone, whoever is the fastest coward to get to the FBI, will spill it all.

Now we get to the meat of this post.

Already, there are the rumblings of “Jobsgate.”

Jeffrey Lord, at The American Spectator, has the timeline for “Jobsgate” and an analysis of crimes that have possibly been committed by someone in the White House, specifically, offering jobs to people to get them to do something, or, in these situations, to get them to not do a certain thing.

The Denver Post, back in September, ran a story about Andrew Romanoff being offered a job by Obama White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina to stay out of the primary against US Senator Michael Bennet.  When asked about it, Romanoff ran away.

Democratic congressman Joe Sestak is running against Arlen Specter, and has said numerous times that he was offered a job by someone in the White House if he would withdraw from the primary, and that he declined the offer.  The White House declines comment whenever asked about this.

Here’s where it gets good.  As we learned during Watergate and the Lewinsky-Clinton episode, it isn’t the crime that gets you, it’s the cover-up.

“There’s a crime called misprision of a felony. Misprision of a felony is when you don’t report a crime. So you’re getting into pretty deep areas here in these considerations.” – U.S. Senator Arlen Specter on March 12, 2010

If in fact Sestak is telling the truth, if in fact the Denver Post story about Andrew Romanoff is correct — and neither Sestak nor Romanoff reported these offers to federal authorities — Specter is saying both could in fact do jail time for committing a felony.

Stunningly, this would presumably also include anyone on the Obama White House staff who knew one of their colleagues had offered such a job — which is to say committed a crime — and didn’t report it.

Congressman Darrell Issa has stepped up and sent an official letter of inquiry to White House Council Bauer, and has formally requested an answer by March 18.

“Right now, they’re doing the ‘I won’t confirm or deny,’ and for us, it leaves two possibilities. One is the promise of transparency in this administration is just shot. The second one is even worse, which is either Sestak is lying or the administration has done something wrong and is covering it up…” – U.S. Congressman Darrell Issa on Friday on March 12, 2010

This could all get very interesting.  I’m marking March 18 on my calendar, so I can remember to check around to see if Congressman Issa receives an answer.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 6 comments }

We’re Deemed! We’re Deemed!

by Conservative Pup on March 16, 2010

Lot of people talking and writing about the Slaughter Rule and the ‘deem and pass’ procedure the Democratic Socialist Party is considering.  I’ve been jumping around the ‘net and just want to share some of the gems I’ve found this morning.

House Republicans to force vote on Pelosi’s Slaughter House solution, Michelle Malkin

“We have entered a political wonderland, where the rules are whatever Democrats say they are.”-WSJ.com

“Once upon a time, some Democrats were opposed to Slaughter-like solutions…and you’ll never guess which three.”–Sister Toldjah

“No trickery here” and “nothing unusual” about using the Slaughter Rule, says House Dem Whip-And So It Goes In Shreveport

Without Firing A Shot, David Limbaugh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 11 comments }

The Last Days Of The Democratic Party

by Conservative Pup on March 15, 2010

The Democrats are on the verge of creating their own extinction.  Determined to pass the Health Care Takeover/Rationing Bill, NO MATTER what their constituents have told them repeatedly in meetings, letters, phone calls, and faxes, these soon-to-be-irrelevant people are lining up behind their party leaders to walk right off the plank.

What we have here is a failure to communicate. At no time in American history has the ruling party so insistently striven to impose its iron will on such a loudly unwilling citizenry. They are not listening, and they will stop at nothing.

When flim-flammery fails, try intimidation.
When intimidation fails, try chicanery.
When chicanery fails, try illegal.
And when illegal fails, try unconstitutional.”

The above was written by a poster at RedState.com who calls him/herself E Pluribus Unum.  He/she has an encouraging opinion of what will happen if the Dems use the Slaughter Rule to circumvent the Constitution and make their bill into law.  Quoting the Constitution, he writes:

Article 1, Section 7:(excerpt)
Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law,be presented to the President of the United States;…….But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively.

There is no ambiguity here.  Bills must be voted on to become law. EPU (E Pluribus) explains in a nutshell what the Slaughter Rule is, and how it works.

Unable to pass the Senate bill in the House, unable to pass ANY bill in the Senate (thank you Massachusetts), and thwarted in their attempt at reconciliation parlor tricks, the Democrats have hatched a plan. The House will vote on and (presumably) pass a new bill, which is the Senate Bill with amendments. Call it House Bill #2. House Rules Chairman Louise Slaughter will propose a rule deeming the Senate bill to be “passed”, the new rule will be voted on and (presumably) approved by the House, and the amended bill — House Bill #2 — will be sent to Obama to be signed into law.

Now, he/she gets to the heart of the matter:  what happens if the Dems actually go through with this, to us and to them?  E Pluribus continues.

Before this, Democrats were already going to lose HUGE in November. There are more House Democrats retiring in “safe” districts than there are Cincinnati Bengals and Dallas Cowboys in prison. But if they try this stunt, the ensuing electoral revolt will be epic and irreversible, resulting in a Democrat Party crippled so irredeemably that I predict a new center-left party will emerge in the next 10 years, attempting to shed the stench of scandal and disrepute that will be permanently connected to the Democrats. Most likely the partisan press will accelerate their own death spiral as they are unwilling to speak ill of the Democrats.

But that is November. What will happen in March?

Six things I can think of, the first three within days.

1. The Supreme Court will strike it down within days.

I encourage you to go here and read the whole post.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 3 comments }

Pup’s Picks March 13,2010

by Conservative Pup on March 13, 2010

Another group of Pup’s Picks.  Happy Daylight-Savings-Time weekend, everybody!

John, over at America You Asked For It, gets it, just as all the rest of us do, and wonders why such a smart man with a ‘Hahvad’ education doesn’t.  John, as for your last sentence, my thoughts exactly.

If you’re gay, or know and love someone who is, you have to be baffled by the gay community’s continued support of the Democratic party, and their stance of radical Islam being a non-issue, basically.  Are they not hearing about things like thisCreeping Sharia, as always, keeps us informed of the incidents we won’t hear or read in the establishment media.

FREEDOM EDEN has a great piece on Nancy Pelosi’s imaginary dream world, and asks the questions the reporter who was interviewing Pelosi should have asked.

Who and what are those people “representing” us in Washington?  Have they completely lost their soulsFreedom’s Wings thinks so, and I’d have to agree with her.

Native Americans against Obamacare, and the “Slaughter Solution“–The Frugal Cafe Blog Zone has the video and info.  Thanks, Vicki, I didn’t know about this.

Have you been hearing about the “grassroots” group that has sprung up in response to the Tea Parties?  Calling themselves the Coffee Party, they claim to be just regular people, also “dissatisfied” with a number of things, primarily of which are the Tea Parties.  The Left Coast Rebel tells you everything you need to know about this Soros-funded radical-left-activist instigated group.  And I do mean everything, very informative and comprehensive.

You’ve probably heard about Tom Hanks and his comments about WWII and America’s conflict with the Japanese at that time.   Roman Around has a most excellent piece about Hanks’ comments and teaches some true history while he’s at it.  Great job, Andrew!

The Reaganite Republican has more on the “political cowardice…and the shredding of the Constitution,” by the pending “Slaughter solution” which may be used to make the health care rationing bill law.  Serious stuff, and thanks James, for posting this.

Finally, at Watching The Nation, Kathy has this on possible changes coming to FOX News, and the company’s second largest shareholder.  I didn’t know about this, and all of us who have trusted FOX for complete and balanced news need to take note.  We shall just have to watch and see.  Disturbing, to say the least.

And that’s a wrap.  Pup out.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

“When Green Kills”–Mark Steyn

March 12, 2010

I love Mark Steyn and his way with words.  Most recently, he tells us as only he can, about the short-sightedness and lack of common sense when “green” is the only goal, the only thought.
Zamboni make the ice resurfacing carts that are a familiar sight at any hockey game, and also at any number of [...]

Read the full article →

Silly Me, I’ve Been Paying For My Own Satellite TV

March 10, 2010

Well, I had no idea that the government wanted to provide me with satellite TV.  Apparently, providing satellite TV to rural areas is included in that bill that Jim Bunning refused to support.
Well, gosh, if I had known that…..
Here I’ve been paying for my own satellite TV because, silly me, I thought it was something [...]

Read the full article →

A Very Different Vision Of America

March 9, 2010

From Dennis Prager:
As reported by The Washington Post, “President Obama’s proposed budget would add more than $9.7 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, congressional budget analysts said Friday.”
CNN adds, “Of that amount, an estimated $5.6 trillion will be in interest alone.”
The Post continues: “The CBO (Congressional Budget Office) and the White House [...]

Read the full article →

Pup’s Picks 3/6/2010

March 6, 2010

The week has flown by and regretfully I haven’t added anything of value here.  Tax season, the start of garden prep, washed out pond dams to patch, cattle to move around, and all the other joys of daily living have kept me from the computer.  I’m not complaining.  I love being busy, and I love [...]

Read the full article →