I don’t want to sound like a know-it-all, but we were talking just the other night about the oil spill, people blaming BHO, how it could hurt him in polling, and such, and then we remembered the Cloward-Piven strategy of using crises to disrupt the system, with the ultimate goal of killing capitalism by overloading it. Not only using crises, but creating them if necessary. I am not saying that the Obama gang created the oil spill, but they have certainly not put forth much effort to stop the leak or assist with preventing damage to the marshes and coastline.
Then this morning I saw this at American Thinker, and was not surprised that others are thinking along the same lines. Go read “Don’t Be Fooled By Obama’s ‘Incompetency’.”
We have got to win at the ballot box in November.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=f7fc1bbc-1abe-4f41-ab26-94b721c821b0)
{ 7 comments }
Interesting isn’t it? Yes, it is.
I don’t buy it. If this was an actual strategy it would be logical to implement it by looking competent while allowing the damage to happen. It’s hard to see how it would be sensible or effective to both look and be incompetent. How does it help this gaggle if they’re thrown out of office in great numbers in 2010 and then more so in 2012?
This is a variation of the “Bush caused 911″ theory. If he had caused or known of it he would not have seemed so utterly bewildered when told of the events while reading to that class. No one looks that stupid intentionally. Had he been involved he would have planned to look at his best in his reaction. Likewise, if zero was trying to milk this for the C-P strategy he would not be doing so wearing his permanent dunce cap, or so it seems to me.
Sometimes clueless and incompetent bespeaks clueless and incompetent – and nothing more.
Sneed, I always appreciate your take on things. I admit, I go back and forth between thinking he’s just the dumbest man ever to be president, and the above scenario. I do think that some of those around him are smart enough to use this type of disaster in ways that they think will help them. I don’t, and never have, thought that zero (I like that) was the brains of the gang. On the other hand, I think he’s capable of holding a radical left ideology, and being dumb too.
>>>On the other hand, I think he’s capable of holding a radical left ideology, and being dumb too.<<<
Is the opposite even possible? And to supplement my original post, egotistical clowns do not intentionally look like the fourth Stooge (with apologies to the original three).
Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them. This quote came from the Czech Republic. Someone over there has it figured out.
“The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency .
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.
The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”
Bob has made some extremely good points. If we believe the election wasn’t majorly screwed with, the majority of voters (we think) put the prince in office.
So what crisis will there be by November so that the elections will have to be canceled? Anyone bet we get to have them when it looks like a big power shift to the right will happen in Congress? I say walk softly and carry a big stick…I believe there’s some strange things gonna happen between now and then. The threat of the conservative movement is too big for there not to be some kind of backlash to stop its advance.
Maybe, Kathy, but the left was saying similar things about how likely it was that Bush would somehow cancel the election is 2008.
{ 1 trackback }